<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New business directory seeks businesses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flipflops.org/2009/06/17/new-business-directory-seeks-businesses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flipflops.org/2009/06/17/new-business-directory-seeks-businesses/</link>
	<description>Flipflops.org is about web development and fairly conceptual art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:19:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Flipflops</title>
		<link>http://www.flipflops.org/2009/06/17/new-business-directory-seeks-businesses/#comment-11877</link>
		<dc:creator>Flipflops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flipflops.org/2009/06/17/new-business-directory-seeks-businesses/#comment-11877</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve

Thanks for the feedback, it is much appreciated - after all that is what I&#039;m looking for at the moment. I think there is a place for keywords - but they are something that can easily become unwieldy as they scale.

There is a fair bit of refactoring to do anyway, but more importantly, I think adding features and amending the way things work in response to feedback.

As for things like &#039;123&#039;s - as in many things there is the danger of cliche - but people do like to know where they are during processes and have an indication of the process - if people like it it stays - otherwise...

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback, it is much appreciated &#8211; after all that is what I&#8217;m looking for at the moment. I think there is a place for keywords &#8211; but they are something that can easily become unwieldy as they scale.</p>
<p>There is a fair bit of refactoring to do anyway, but more importantly, I think adding features and amending the way things work in response to feedback.</p>
<p>As for things like &#8217;123&#8242;s &#8211; as in many things there is the danger of cliche &#8211; but people do like to know where they are during processes and have an indication of the process &#8211; if people like it it stays &#8211; otherwise&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.flipflops.org/2009/06/17/new-business-directory-seeks-businesses/#comment-11876</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flipflops.org/2009/06/17/new-business-directory-seeks-businesses/#comment-11876</guid>
		<description>Always like to have a look at any new directories.

Fresh faced but the cloud concept spoils it for me. Think keyword clouds have run their course, but just my opinion.

No business categories, and tried a couple of image uploads which failed. 

Really like the UK map and the 123 concept looks ok, but has been done many times before. We had  a nearly identicle &quot;123&quot; look about 4 years ago. But it does make the site look familar, so could be a good thing, time will tell.

Not bad at all, and quite a catchy name. Good luck.

Steve Richardson
My Local Services</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always like to have a look at any new directories.</p>
<p>Fresh faced but the cloud concept spoils it for me. Think keyword clouds have run their course, but just my opinion.</p>
<p>No business categories, and tried a couple of image uploads which failed. </p>
<p>Really like the UK map and the 123 concept looks ok, but has been done many times before. We had  a nearly identicle &#8220;123&#8243; look about 4 years ago. But it does make the site look familar, so could be a good thing, time will tell.</p>
<p>Not bad at all, and quite a catchy name. Good luck.</p>
<p>Steve Richardson<br />
My Local Services</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

