<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compare UK online payment providers</title>
	<link>http://www.flipflops.org/2007/05/22/compare-online-payment-providers/</link>
	<description>Stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Darfuria</title>
		<link>http://www.flipflops.org/2007/05/22/compare-online-payment-providers/#comment-4312</link>
		<author>Darfuria</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 08:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.flipflops.org/2007/05/22/compare-online-payment-providers/#comment-4312</guid>
					<description>Seems like PROTX or Google are the best ones there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like PROTX or Google are the best ones there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flipflops</title>
		<link>http://www.flipflops.org/2007/05/22/compare-online-payment-providers/#comment-4317</link>
		<author>Flipflops</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 11:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.flipflops.org/2007/05/22/compare-online-payment-providers/#comment-4317</guid>
					<description>I'm not wildly keen on PROTX - from an integration point of view - although customers do like them on a price basis.

I really like the Secure Trading integration - once I figured out how it worked, but they don't seem to be priced that competatively at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not wildly keen on PROTX - from an integration point of view - although customers do like them on a price basis.</p>
<p>I really like the Secure Trading integration - once I figured out how it worked, but they don&#8217;t seem to be priced that competatively at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darfuria</title>
		<link>http://www.flipflops.org/2007/05/22/compare-online-payment-providers/#comment-4322</link>
		<author>Darfuria</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 14:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.flipflops.org/2007/05/22/compare-online-payment-providers/#comment-4322</guid>
					<description>It's surprising how many people actually don't like 'giving' their money to Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s surprising how many people actually don&#8217;t like &#8216;giving&#8217; their money to Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Carson</title>
		<link>http://www.flipflops.org/2007/05/22/compare-online-payment-providers/#comment-9500</link>
		<author>Gary Carson</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.flipflops.org/2007/05/22/compare-online-payment-providers/#comment-9500</guid>
					<description>We have been using Protx for around 3 years and apart from the occasional glitch they have been a good provider.
However we have just discovered a serious problem with our account during June, when between 60 and 70 transactions were logged as "Client time-out Error" in our Protx VSP Admin Area when in fact a "Transaction Approved" response was sent to our system. This resulted in our customers receiving their orders when they had not paid.
If antone else has had this problem or something similar could they please reply - especially if they found any way of proving Protx's responsibility for this.
Thanks,
Gary Carson
Rabbie's Trail Burners Ltd., Edinburgh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have been using Protx for around 3 years and apart from the occasional glitch they have been a good provider.<br />
However we have just discovered a serious problem with our account during June, when between 60 and 70 transactions were logged as &#8220;Client time-out Error&#8221; in our Protx VSP Admin Area when in fact a &#8220;Transaction Approved&#8221; response was sent to our system. This resulted in our customers receiving their orders when they had not paid.<br />
If antone else has had this problem or something similar could they please reply - especially if they found any way of proving Protx&#8217;s responsibility for this.<br />
Thanks,<br />
Gary Carson<br />
Rabbie&#8217;s Trail Burners Ltd., Edinburgh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
